URGENT UPDATE: A federal judge has just ordered President Donald Trump to relinquish control of the California National Guard, marking a significant victory for state officials amid an escalating standoff. On October 25, 2023, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco ruled against the Trump administration’s efforts to deploy federal troops in the region, insisting they must return control to Governor Gavin Newsom.
This ruling underscores a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over federal troop deployments, which the administration claimed were necessary to protect immigration agents from protestors. Judge Breyer found these justifications unconvincing, leading to his emphatic directive: “Get your damn hands off the National Guard.”
Former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner reacted to the ruling in a passionate video, expressing his approval of the judge’s strong language. Kirschner noted, “I love it when they talk like that. Gives me the justice goosebumps.” His remarks resonate with many who see this ruling as a critical step toward restoring state authority.
The judge’s decision follows a series of similar court rulings that have challenged Trump’s attempts to federalize the National Guard in various states, including a recent case in Oregon where a judge accused the administration of fabricating conditions to justify troop deployments.
This latest development is part of a broader trend of judicial pushback against Trump’s controversial immigration policies, significantly impacting the dynamics between federal and state authorities. As legal battles unfold, the implications for governance and civil rights remain profound.
As the situation develops, observers are keenly watching how the Trump administration will respond to this decisive ruling. Will further legal challenges arise, or will the federal government comply? Stay tuned for updates on this critical issue.
The ruling not only affects military control but could also influence public sentiment regarding immigration policy and federal oversight in states. This case exemplifies the tension between federal authority and state governance, a debate that is increasingly relevant as the nation heads into election season.
For ongoing updates, follow our coverage as we bring you the latest developments in this unfolding story.
