On October 20, 1967, a discussion session on the draft law took place at the University of North Dakota, led by Rev. Robert Branconnier. The event aimed to provide a platform for young individuals to explore their military service obligations and discuss concerns related to the draft. A total of 22 attendees participated, including a mix of ages and backgrounds, indicating a community keen on engaging with the complexities of military service.
The session was held at Rev. Branconnier’s residence located at 412 Cambridge St. He emphasized the need to create a “reading room” where youths could come together to talk about their responsibilities under the draft law. This initiative was designed to foster open dialogue on various issues, including conscientious objector status, which allows individuals to opt out of military service for moral or ethical reasons.
Rev. Branconnier stated, “If some want to take a conscientious objector stand, it is very important they do it the right way. There are forms to be filled out.” He noted that proper guidance is essential for those uncertain about their options. The discussion also addressed the anxieties some attendees expressed regarding potential refusals of conscientious objector status, as well as their interest in non-cooperation actions.
Although there was no formal organization established during the session, resources about the draft law were made available for attendees. Rev. Branconnier mentioned that counseling could involve knowledgeable individuals from the campus or possibly members of the draft board, although he expressed uncertainty over the latter’s participation.
The discussion attracted a diverse audience, with some attendees seeking information while others appeared to have differing opinions on the priest’s stance regarding the draft. Rev. Branconnier described the atmosphere as one of inquiry, stating that he gathered from comments that a few participants were not in sympathy with his position.
Looking ahead, Rev. Branconnier announced that additional sessions would be scheduled for the following Thursday and Friday at 8 p.m.. These meetings aim to further explore available resources and provide continued support for those navigating the complexities of the draft law.
This community engagement reflects the ongoing dialogue surrounding military service obligations during a period of significant social change in the United States. The initiative underscores the importance of informed discussions as young individuals face critical decisions about their futures.
