BREAKING: A federal judge has just dismissed all criminal mortgage fraud charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James in a major legal victory. In a ruling issued on July 15, 2023, Judge Cameron McGowan Currie determined that the prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, lacked the legal authority to bring the case against James.
The judge’s decision came after James and her legal team successfully argued that Halligan’s appointment was improper. Currie explicitly stated that Halligan, a political appointee with limited prosecutorial experience, could not rightfully present the indictment. This ruling marks a significant setback for former President Donald Trump, who has faced criticism for allegedly using the Justice Department to target political opponents, including James and former FBI director James Comey.
In response to the ruling, James expressed her gratitude and resilience, stating, “I am heartened by today’s victory and grateful for the prayers and support I have received from around the country. I remain fearless in the face of these baseless charges as I continue fighting for New Yorkers every single day.” Her statement underscores the emotional weight of this legal battle, not just for her but for supporters who view it as a fight against political persecution.
The dismissal of this case is part of a broader narrative involving the Eastern District of Virginia, where Halligan was appointed by Trump after he criticized her predecessor for failing to act against James and Comey. On the same day, Judge Currie dismissed charges against Comey, further amplifying concerns around the politicization of legal processes.
As this story develops, many are watching closely for potential repercussions for the Trump administration and its handling of legal matters against political figures. The Department of Justice has not yet commented on this latest ruling, leaving room for speculation about future actions.
Stay tuned for updates as more information becomes available. This is a rapidly evolving situation that could have significant implications for political and legal landscapes in the United States.
