The University of Colorado (CU) is currently navigating a complex discussion surrounding the legacy of former football coach Bill McCartney, who passed away recently. In light of his controversial past, particularly regarding inclusivity, student leaders and faculty members are advocating for a reevaluation of how his contributions are honored on campus. This includes proposals to contextualize McCartney’s statue, ensuring it reflects the university’s commitment to diversity and inclusion.
In a letter to the editor, Jean Hodges expressed her appreciation for the editorial by Garry Garrison, which highlighted the need to honor McCartney’s impact while acknowledging the historical context of his actions. McCartney was a prominent figure during a time when discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals was prevalent in Colorado. His leadership was marked by a national championship in 1990, yet it was also marred by public displays of homophobia, particularly during a Promise Keepers rally in which he participated.
Hodges, whose family has deep ties to CU dating back to 1960, recounted how her pride in the university was overshadowed by McCartney’s public statements. She emphasized that placing his statue without recognizing the full history would not only celebrate his achievements but also disregard the pain caused by his actions. “The University of Colorado is better than its darkest indelible moments,” she stated.
In light of this, Hodges supports student leadership in their call for a historic plaque to accompany the statue. This plaque would serve to acknowledge the complexities of McCartney’s legacy, allowing the university to celebrate his successes while reaffirming its core value of inclusivity. She urged Chancellor Justin Schwartz to consider these suggestions, which aim to foster a more inclusive environment on campus.
In a separate discussion, Dean Garyet also weighed in on the recent changes in air traffic regulations following the conclusion of a government shutdown. He proposed that capping the number of private jet flights would be a more effective measure to reduce the strain on air traffic controllers than limiting commercial flights. According to data from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the U.S. sees approximately 45,000 commercial flights daily, carrying around 2.34 million passengers. In contrast, private jet flights number between 10,000 and 15,000, serving around 12,000 to 15,000 passengers.
Garyet argued that limiting private flights could also significantly reduce carbon emissions, presenting an opportunity for the U.S. to showcase its commitment to environmental responsibility. He noted that this discussion is crucial in determining whether the nation will prioritize the welfare of the broader population or cater primarily to the interests of the economic elite.
As these discussions unfold, the University of Colorado and its community members are grappling with how best to honor its history while moving toward a more inclusive future. The outcomes of these proposals may well shape the university’s identity for years to come, as stakeholders seek to balance recognition of past achievements with a commitment to fostering an inclusive environment for all students.
