A bipartisan initiative in the Pennsylvania House is seeking to eliminate the use of harmful “forever chemicals” from everyday products. This legislative effort aims to address the long-term health risks associated with routine exposure to substances known as PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances—which have been linked to serious health conditions.
The measure, introduced by State Rep. Greg Scott, a Democrat representing Montgomery County, proposes a ban on PFAS in a range of products, including cosmetics, dental floss, children’s items, and menstrual products. Scott emphasized the importance of addressing the risks posed by these synthetic chemicals, which are commonly used to repel water, oil, and stains, and persist in both the environment and the human body.
Scott pointed out that while public awareness has largely focused on PFAS contamination in drinking water, particularly near airports and military sites where firefighting foams have leaked, these chemicals are much more widespread. “These products are used on the face, in the mouth, or by babies and toddlers exploring the world,” he stated. “Every time a person uses one of these products, they’re exposed. Over a lifetime, that adds up.”
The proposed legislation has garnered support from both sides of the aisle, including Rep. Natalie Mihalek, a Republican from Allegheny and Washington counties. Mihalek noted that consumers often lack the means to avoid PFAS exposure and called for decisive action. “Forever chemicals got their name for a reason,” she remarked, highlighting the growing concerns about the presence of such substances in food and household products.
Beyond personal health implications, legislators are also considering the environmental effects of PFAS. Products containing these chemicals discarded in landfills can degrade over time, potentially contaminating groundwater and threatening local drinking water supplies.
House Bill 2145 seeks to prohibit the use of PFAS in the manufacturing of targeted products while allowing manufacturers a transition period to comply with the new regulations. Proponents argue that the bill effectively balances public health concerns with the practical needs of industry.
As the legislation progresses through the political process, it will be a litmus test for Pennsylvania’s readiness to confront the increasing scrutiny of “forever chemicals” on a national scale. The growing awareness of the health and environmental risks associated with PFAS underscores the urgency of this legislative effort.
For those interested in developments related to health and safety, following local news sources like MyChesCo is advisable for updates on legislative actions and community impacts.
